Ok, here it the correct version ;-)
public class AdjustQuotasBehavior : AbstractServiceHostAware
{
private const int FIVE_MEGABYTES = 1024 * 1024 * 5;
protected override void Opening(ServiceHost serviceHost)
{
var defaultServiceHost = serviceHost as
DefaultServiceHost;
if (defaultServiceHost != null)
{
defaultServiceHost.EndpointCreated += (_,
newEndpoint) =>
{
var binding =
newEndpoint.Endpoint.Binding as BasicHttpBinding;
if (binding != null)
{
binding.MaxBufferSize =
FIVE_MEGABYTES;
binding.MaxBufferPoolSize =
FIVE_MEGABYTES;
binding.MaxReceivedMessageSize
= FIVE_MEGABYTES;
binding.ReaderQuotas.MaxArrayLength = FIVE_MEGABYTES;
binding.ReaderQuotas.MaxDepth =
FIVE_MEGABYTES;
binding.ReaderQuotas.MaxStringContentLength = FIVE_MEGABYTES;
binding.ReaderQuotas.MaxBytesPerRead = FIVE_MEGABYTES;
binding.ReaderQuotas.MaxNameTableCharCount = FIVE_MEGABYTES;
}
};
}
}
}
Idea was correct, but the Opening hook was called before WCF Faciity added new
endpoint (hence no endpoints).
Therefore, I just hooked onto the EndpointCreatedEvent
cheers,
craig
On Oct 14, 2010, at 11:24 AM, João Bragança wrote:
> Unfortunately no. I tried this approach already. As I understand it,
> the only thing allowed in the message body is a Stream, and the method
> must return void. I need to upload an image, insert a record into the
> database, and receive a PK back. This is used in the next request.
>
> If I switched to net 4.0 would I be able to easily get this done?
>
> On Oct 14, 5:27 am, Craig Neuwirt <[email protected]> wrote:
>> We may be going about this the wrong way. I think a better approach for
>> uploading images is to use the WCF streaming model. This should eliminate
>> the size issue, but you will need to configure a binding to specify it.
>>
>> Here is a good
>> posthttp://weblogs.asp.net/cibrax/archive/2007/08/29/sending-attachments-...
>>
>> Are you able to do this in your app?
>>
>> On Oct 13, 2010, at 1:26 PM, João Bragança wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> No, not really. The actual client is a Flex/AIR application.
>>
>>> On Oct 13, 10:22 am, Craig Neuwirt <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> Do you happen to have a client the performs the upload with the image
>>>> culprit? If not, I can write one.
>>
>>>> On Oct 12, 2010, at 1:28 PM, João Bragança wrote:
>>
>>>>> Here's a repo of the bug. Thanks again for taking a look!
>>
>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>>> From: Craig Neuwirt <[email protected]>
>>>>> Date: Oct 12, 11:00 am
>>>>> Subject: Wcf Facility, DefaultBinding and Quota Exceeded
>>>>> To: Castle Project Users
>>
>>>>> Any chance you can zip me a subset of your app so I can run it locally
>>>>> and try and find a solution for you? Just enough to demonstrate the i
>>
>>>>> On Oct 12, 2010, at 11:24 AM, João Bragança wrote:
>>
>>>>>> Craig,
>>
>>>>>> In OnOpening the serviceHost doesn't have any bindings. I tried it in
>>>>>> OnOpened but I got the same error.
>>
>>>>>> On Oct 12, 8:06 am, Craig Neuwirt <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>> Good question. WCF makes it a real pain to manipulate the quota stuff.
>>
>>>>>>> I am not sure the best way to handle this, but this might work for you
>>
>>>>>>> create
>>
>>>>>>> public class AdjustQuotasBehavior : AbstractServiceHostAware
>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>> protected override Opening(ServiceHost serviceHost)
>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>> foreach (var endpoint in serviceHost.Description.Endpoints)
>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>> var binding = endpoint.Binding as BasicHttpBinding;
>>>>>>> if (binding != null)
>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>> binding.ReaderQuotas.MaxArrayLength = FIVE_MEGABYTES;
>>>>>>> // Do same for other
>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>> }
>>
>>>>>>> }
>>
>>>>>>> And register this component in container
>>
>>>>>>> container.Register(Component.For< AdjustQuotasBehavior>())
>>
>>>>>>> I have never tried this though. I could add service binding inference
>>>>>>> from base address like I did with clients, but this would only work for
>>>>>>> 3.5
>>>>>>> since I used the default endpoint support out of the box for WCF 4.0
>>
>>>>>>> Let me know how this goes and we'll find another way if this doesn't
>>>>>>> work
>>
>>>>>>> good luck,
>>>>>>> craig
>>
>>>>>>> On Oct 12, 2010, at 9:38 AM, João Bragança wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>> What is the simplest way to override this? I really don't want to
>>>>>>>> configure all the endpoints by hand if I can avoid it.
>>
>>>>>>>> On Oct 12, 6:34 am, Craig Neuwirt <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> If I recall, the DefaultBinding stuff comes into play when you
>>>>>>>>> specify endpoints without bindings. I think in your case, the
>>>>>>>>> default endpoint logic is getting applied which is based on the base
>>>>>>>>> address and not the default binding.
>>
>>>>>>>>> On Oct 11, 2010, at 7:23 PM, João Bragança wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>>>> I have a WCF service where I need to upload images. I am configuring
>>>>>>>>>> it like so:
>>
>>>>>>>>>> public class WcfServicesInstaller : IWindsorInstaller
>>>>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>>>>> private const int FIVE_MEGABYTES = 1024*1024*5;
>>
>>>>>>>>>> private const string SERVICE_SUFFIX = "Service";
>>
>>>>>>>>>> #region IWindsorInstaller Members
>>
>>>>>>>>>> public void Install(IWindsorContainer container,
>>>>>>>>>> IConfigurationStore
>>>>>>>>>> store)
>>>>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>>>>> container.AddFacility<WcfFacility>(f =>
>>>>>>>>>> f.DefaultBinding = new
>>>>>>>>>> BasicHttpBinding
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> {
>>
>>>>>>>>>> MaxReceivedMessageSize = FIVE_MEGABYTES,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> // 5
>>>>>>>>>> megs,
>>
>>>>>>>>>> MaxBufferPoolSize = FIVE_MEGABYTES,
>>
>>>>>>>>>> MaxBufferSize = FIVE_MEGABYTES,
>>
>>>>>>>>>> ReaderQuotas = new XmlDictionaryReaderQuotas
>>
>>>>>>>>>> {
>>
>>>>>>>>>> MaxArrayLength = FIVE_MEGABYTES,
>>
>>>>>>>>>> MaxDepth = FIVE_MEGABYTES,
>>
>>>>>>>>>> MaxStringContentLength =
>>>>>>>>>> FIVE_MEGABYTES,
>>
>>>>>>>>>> MaxNameTableCharCount =
>>>>>>>>>> FIVE_MEGABYTES,
>>
>>>>>>>>>> MaxBytesPerRead = FIVE_MEGABYTES
>>
>>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> })
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> .Register(AllTypes.FromAssemblyContaining<IAuthenticationService>()
>>>>>>>>>> .Where(type =>
>>>>>>>>>> type.Name.EndsWith(SERVICE_SUFFIX))
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> .WithService.FirstInterface()
>>>>>>>>>> .Configure(r =>
>>>>>>>>>> NameService(r).LifeStyle.Transient),
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Component.For<IServiceBehavior>()
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> .ImplementedBy<ServiceDebugBehavior>()
>>>>>>>>>> .DependsOn(new
>>>>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> IncludeExceptionDetailInFaults = true,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> HttpHelpPageEnabled = true,
>>>>>>>>>> }),
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Component.For<IServiceBehavior>()
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> .ImplementedBy<ServiceMetadataBehavior>()
>>>>>>>>>> .DependsOn(new
>>>>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> HttpGetEnabled = true
>>>>>>>>>> }),
>>
>>>>>>>>>> Component.For<IServiceBehavior>().ImplementedBy<UnitOfWorkBehavior>());
>>>>>>>>>> }
>>
>>>>>>>>>> #endregion
>>
>>>>>>>>>> private static ComponentRegistration<object>
>>>>>>>>>> NameService(ComponentRegistration<object> registration)
>>>>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>>>>> var implementation = registration.Implementation;
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> registration.Named(implementation.Name.Substring(0,
>>>>>>>>>> implementation.Name.Length - SERVICE_SUFFIX.Length)
>>>>>>>>>> .ToLowerInvariant() +
>>>>>>>>>> ".svc");
>>>>>>>>>> return registration;
>>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>> }
>>
>>>>>>>>>> But when I upload one I get everyone's second favorite wcf exception:
>>
>>>>>>>>>> The formatter threw an exception while trying to deserialize the
>>>>>>>>>> message: There was an error while trying to deserialize parameter
>>>>>>>>>> http://tempuri.org/:Data. The InnerException message was 'There was
>>>>>>>>>> an
>>>>>>>>>> error deserializing the object of type System.Byte[]. The maximum
>>>>>>>>>> array length quota (16384) has been exceeded while reading XML data.
>>>>>>>>>> This quota may be increased by changing the MaxArrayLength property
>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>> the XmlDictionaryReaderQuotas object used when creating the XML
>>>>>>>>>> reader. Line 1, position 26406.
>>
>>>>>>>>>> Is the wcf facility ignoring my DefaultBinding when using the "look
>>>>>>>>>> no
>>>>>>>>>> config" method? Or am I doing something else wrong?
>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>>>>>> Groups "Castle Project Users" group.
>>>>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected].
>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected].
>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit this group
>>>>>>>>>> athttp://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.
>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>>>> Groups "Castle Project Users" group.
>>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to
>>>>>>>> [email protected].
>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>>>>>> [email protected].
>>>>>>>> For more options, visit this group
>>>>>>>> athttp://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.
>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>> Groups "Castle Project Users" group.
>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to
>>>>>> [email protected].
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>>>> [email protected].
>>>>>> For more options, visit this group
>>>>>> athttp://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.
>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>>>>> "Castle Project Users" group.
>>>>> To post to this group, send email to
>>>>> [email protected].
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>>> [email protected].
>>>>> For more options, visit this group
>>>>> athttp://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.
>>>>> <IHateWcfConfiguration.zip>
>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>>> "Castle Project Users" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> [email protected].
>>> For more options, visit this group
>>> athttp://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Castle Project Users" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Castle Project Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.
