Can you come up with a real scenario where that would be useful?
On 27/10/2010 10:23 AM, IanT8 wrote:
It was something I was asked after giving a presentation on Windsor,
and I had not considered it before. As I've used several IOCs I wasn't
sure whether this was available or not.
On Oct 27, 11:03 am, xtoff<[email protected]> wrote:
not really. Why would you want that?
On Oct 27, 3:04 am, IanT8<[email protected]> wrote:
Does windsor support the notion of public and private components? For
example, if Component A depends on Component B and both are registered
on the container, client code can directly resolve an instance of
Component A but not Component B. Component B would essentially be
invisible to client code, part of the inner workings of A only.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle
Project Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.
