I'm hijacking this thread :)

Speaking of which there's already a suggestion for it in user voice: http://castle.uservoice.com/forums/38955-windsor-v3/suggestions/1101835-support-only-singleton-transient?ref=title

I'm interested in hearing everyone's opinion about it.

On 19/11/2010 10:31 PM, Germán Schuager wrote:
I've had an improved implementation of this lifestyle but it was not published anywhere until today. Yesterday I asked Mauricio if he could review it and add it to Castle.Windsor.Lifestyles project on github and he certainly did that. I think that the implementation is cleaner and it also allows you to explicitly define the context under which the contextual components should live; if you don't specify a context then it is assumed that the context is delimited by the current call to container.Resolve

The project is here: https://github.com/castleprojectcontrib/Castle.Windsor.Lifestyles and you can review its usage in the tests: https://github.com/castleprojectcontrib/Castle.Windsor.Lifestyles/blob/master/Castle.Windsor.Lifestyles.Tests/Contextual/ContainerContextFixture.cs

On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 10:43 PM, José F. Romaniello <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Every session management infrastructure should implement
    icurrentsessioncontext , that way our daos depends upon nhibernate.
    OTOH i use the same dao and query objects for web apps, desktop and so
    on.

    2010/11/18, Germán Schuager <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>>:
    > I haven't been involved in a project based on a fat client for
    quite some
    > time now, but I think that if I need to start something from
    scratch right
    > now I wouldn't use NH facility; instead I'd use NH own mecanism
    based on
    > implementing ICurrentSessionContext and accessing ISessions via
    > ISessionFactory.GetCurrentSession().
    > I'd probably take a look at what's in uNhAddins.
    >
    > 2010/11/17 Krzysztof Koźmic <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>>
    >
    >>  Germán what's your current approach out of curiosity?
    >>
    >> Krzysztof
    >>
    >>
    >> On 18/11/2010 12:43 PM, Germán Schuager wrote:
    >>
    >> Although I don't use this approach anymore for managing NH
    sessions, maybe
    >> you can take some ideas from these posts:
    >> http://blog.schuager.com/2008/11/custom-windsor-lifestyle.html
    >>
    http://blog.schuager.com/2009/03/rich-client-nhibernate-session.html
    >>
    >> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 8:13 PM, SimonB
    >> <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>>wrote:
    >>
    >>> Castle Windsor creates multiple instances of grand child
    objects using
    >>> transient lifestyle.
    >>>
    >>> I have an object graph:
    >>> - Object A has a dependency on C1 and C2.
    >>> - C1 and C2 both have a dependency on GC.
    >>> - I need C1 and C2 to have the same GS in a given build up.
    >>>
    >>> Using StructureMap a single instance of GC is created and
    passed to
    >>> both C1 and C2.
    >>> Using Castle.Windsor a new instance of GC is created for C1
    and C2 -
    >>> ie 2 instances.
    >>>
    >>> In my case GS is managing a nHibernate session, and C1 and C2 are
    >>> repositories used by domain class A.
    >>>
    >>> Castle Windsor is returning 2 sessions causing cross session data
    >>> errors.
    >>>
    >>> Does anyone know how to get access to or use the build up
    context so
    >>> the instances of child objects can be cached like structure map.
    >>>
    >>> Thanks,
    >>>
    >>> SB
    >>>
    >>> --
    >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the
    Google Groups
    >>> "Castle Project Users" group.
    >>> To post to this group, send email to
    >>> [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>.
    >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
    >>> [email protected]
    
<mailto:castle-project-users%[email protected]><castle-project-users%[email protected]
    <mailto:castle-project-users%[email protected]>>
    >>> .
    >>> For more options, visit this group at
    >>> http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.
    >>>
    >>>
    >>  --
    >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the
    Google Groups
    >> "Castle Project Users" group.
    >> To post to this group, send email to
    [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>
    >> .
    >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
    >> [email protected]
    <mailto:castle-project-users%[email protected]>.
    >> For more options, visit this group at
    >> http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.
    >>
    >>
    >>  --
    >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the
    Google Groups
    >> "Castle Project Users" group.
    >> To post to this group, send email to
    [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>
    >> .
    >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
    >> [email protected]
    
<mailto:castle-project-users%[email protected]><castle-project-users%[email protected]
    <mailto:castle-project-users%[email protected]>>
    >> .
    >> For more options, visit this group at
    >> http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.
    >>
    >
    > --
    > You received this message because you are subscribed to the
    Google Groups
    > "Castle Project Users" group.
    > To post to this group, send email to
    [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>.
    > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
    > [email protected]
    <mailto:castle-project-users%[email protected]>.
    > For more options, visit this group at
    > http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.
    >
    >

    --
    Enviado desde mi dispositivo móvil

    --
    You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
    Groups "Castle Project Users" group.
    To post to this group, send email to
    [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>.
    To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
    [email protected]
    <mailto:castle-project-users%[email protected]>.
    For more options, visit this group at
    http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle 
Project Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.

Reply via email to