These look like data containers, so they wouldn't make good components. They're given as configuration to 'real' components, right? In that case you could use a custom type converter (see http://www.castleproject.org/container/documentation/v21/usersguide/typeconverters.html , http://mikehadlow.blogspot.com/2010/02/10-advanced-windsor-tricks-10.html ). In your custom converter you'd read the filename specified in the Windsor config, deserialize the config and return it.
-- Mauricio On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 3:36 PM, mabra <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi ! > > Thanks, I understand the basics and was probably not too > precise .. ;-) > > I would like to stay with my configuration files, which are like this: > > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> > <netCounterMonitorConfiguration xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/ > XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema";> > <devices> > <device id="switch1" enabled="true" pollInterval="300" > deviceType="lan-switch" > > <textInfo description="The switch in room5." > note="to repair!!" /> > <recipientLinks> > <reference id="1"/> > </recipientLinks> > </device> > </devices> > > <tables> > <table id="tab1" enabled="true" name="ifTable" > counterReadAttempts="3"> > <textInfo description="The switch in room8." note="" > /> > <oidInfo oid=".1.3.6.1.2.1.10.7.2" indexPosition="2" > /> > <deviceLinks> > <reference id="switch1"/> > </deviceLinks> > <rowUsage>all</rowUsage> > <rowLinks> > <reference id="r1"/> > </rowLinks> > </table> > </tables> > ............. > > I feel pretty good with this and have - most of the > time - no database for these types of apps. > Using Windsor, I could apply the mssing link:DI, > which I see mostly for the bigger aspects. But I would > use the above scheme for some class configuration of > the app. Additionally, I would have to stay with > the above scheme for some time. > > So, I think, the easiest way would be, to instantiate > them - as an additional way - by Windsor. It needs one > line of code for me to read the complete hierarchy in. > > If I start with DI, having this as an option to > create a class would be terribly good. So I came > to the facilities. > > Am I completely wrong?? > > Thanks++mabra > > > On May 24, 7:12 pm, Jason Meckley <[email protected]> wrote: > > have a look at the castle wiki< > http://docs.castleproject.org/Windsor.MainPage.ashx>. > > you won't need to serialize your objects to configure them. this is what > > windsor/kernel does. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Castle Project Users" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > . > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.
