I far prefer configuring the container inside code. Leave stuff that network admins should be changing in the config, stuff that developers should change in the code. This has the advantage of keeping your config files clean as well. Not having to recompile and redeploy the app doesn't really buy you that much IMO.
Ryan On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 5:03 AM, bdaniel7 <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > > Is there a recommended (or best) way to configure Windsor? > > I think that xml config has the advantage that I can just deploy the > "new" implementations, modify the bindings in the xml and restart the > app. > While with code I have to recompile and redeploy the entire app. > > > Your thoughts? > > Daniel > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Castle Project Users" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > . > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.
