One of the posts to SO appeared to fix the problem, it was suggested to use TransferMode.StreamedResponse instead of streamed, and to include a default constructor for the message contract return message.
Quite why the first helped I do not know! On Tuesday, 26 June 2012 16:35:59 UTC+1, Matthew Tolliday wrote: > > Hi Craig, > > Thanks for replying, I would be eternally grateful if you were to have a > look, I will try and get you a cut-down version of the codebase I am > currently working on asap. > > Kind regards, > > Matt > > On Tuesday, 26 June 2012 13:55:19 UTC+1, Craig Neuwirt wrote: >> >> Any chance of sending me a test or program which I can run to help you >> out. >> >> -craig >> >> On Jun 26, 2012, at 4:33 AM, Matthew Tolliday wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> Hopefully someone can point me in the right direction with this. >> >> As per: >> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/11138460/another-the-remote-server-returned-an-unexpected-response-400-bad-request >> >> >> I am attempting to configure the endpoints for a WCF service using >> Windsor 3.0 but am unable to do so. >> >> Since posting this question on SO, I have discovered that streaming over >> WCF is not as straightforward as first thought, and have altered the >> contracts to reflect this. >> The solution now uses Message Contracts to encapsulate the return >> information in the MessageHeader and returns only the Stream in the body. >> >> However, the configuration for the endpoints results in a Bad Request >> (400) message, I am unsure where the configuration for the service is being >> taken, from the code I am attempting to configure the binding with, or from >> the web.config file, or somewhere else? This is primarily due to my >> inexperience with WCF. >> >> Debugging the client code shows the injected service using the Streaming >> binding I specifiy, however I am unable to do the same for the service >> side. Changing just the Transport type to Buffered allows the service to be >> hit using these settings, however the requirement neccesitates a streamed >> binding for large file transfer. >> >> Can anyone help? >> >> Thanks in advance, Matt >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Castle Project Users" group. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/castle-project-users/-/dWclkuqCKDUJ. >> To post to this group, send email to >> [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en. >> >> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Users" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/castle-project-users/-/f9fyXHPncKMJ. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.
