correction: "...since i would *not* expect that to throw..." On Wednesday, July 11, 2012 9:42:25 AM UTC-4, bling wrote: > > that would work. > > however, i'm more questioning in the intent of the scanning registration > API, since i would expect that to throw any kind of exception. worst case > should be that you don't have something registered. if that can still be > the case, then you can simply ignore IEnumerable<ValueType> instead of > throwing. > > if that won't fly, you could also do a WithServiceAllInterfaces(bool > excludeSystemInterfaces = true) > > thx! > > p.s. i've logged the bug at http://issues.castleproject.org/issue/IOC-347, > although if you add a new WithService* then it'd be more of a feature > request. > > On Tuesday, July 10, 2012 6:09:48 PM UTC-4, bling wrote: >> >> the following works with 3.0, but throws an exception in 3.1 >> >> var c = new WindsorContainer(); >> >> c.Register(Classes.From(typeof(Dictionary<,>)).Pick().WithServiceBase().WithServiceAllInterfaces()); >> >> i'm not sure what the actual issue is, but exception message complained >> about ICollection<KeyValuePair<,>> so i took a guess and was able to >> reproduce. a class similar to that signature does exist in my actual code. >> >> thanks, >> bling >> >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Users" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/castle-project-users/-/eTbUtzwyAZMJ. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.
