Does that answer the question?
http://kozmic.pl/2010/08/10/ioc-patterns-ndash-partitioning-registration/


-- 
Krzysztof Kozmic


On Wednesday, 12 September 2012 at 9:37 AM, Scott_M wrote:

> We are writing a .NET 4.5 WCF service hosted as a Windows NT service and plan 
> to use latest castle windsor / wcf facility for dependency injection.   The 
> WCF service will have multiple dependencies:
> 
> 1. Business Logic Components (INT and IMPL assemblies)
> 2. Data Access Layer Components (INT and IMPL assemblies)
> 3. Logging Components (INT and IMPL assemblies)
> 4. Various utilities (INT and IMPL assemblies)
> 
> For component registration, we have used xml configuration for similar 
> projects in the past.  However, this was slow, tedious, fragile, and not very 
> re-usable for subsequent projects.   What is best practice for structuring 
> installers for a project of this nature?  Do you write one giant installer 
> project to cover 1-4?  Do you write separate installers for each assembly 
> implementation?   How do you deal with installer dependencies so they are 
> installed in the proper order?  How do you prevent from installing a 
> component twice? 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Castle Project Users" group.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/castle-project-users/-/iVTa2_kh6DkJ.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] 
> (mailto:[email protected]).
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected] 
> (mailto:[email protected]).
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Castle Project Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.

Reply via email to