Thanks Krzysztof! Such a quick response! On Thursday, November 15, 2012 4:36:00 AM UTC+4, Krzysztof Koźmic wrote: > > Hi there, > > no drama, we're all friendly people here :) > > And yes, Unspecified lifestyle ends up being singleton, and that's also > the case for WCF services as far as I'm aware. > > -- > Krzysztof Kozmic > > On Thursday, 15 November 2012 at 10:30 AM, Michael S. wrote: > > Hello all, > > I'm a windsor newbie so please don't punish. It looks like the information > about WCF facility is a little bit outdated as of 3.1.0. I register my WCF > components like that and it seems to work > > container.AddFacility<WcfFacility>() > .Register( > > Component.For<IProductStateMachine>().ImplementedBy<ProductStateMachineService>()); > > I wonder is this component going to be singleton as usually? > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Castle Project Users" group. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/castle-project-users/-/EiFvUUxyh-QJ. > To post to this group, send email to > [email protected]<javascript:> > . > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] <javascript:>. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en. > > >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Users" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/castle-project-users/-/B8hnNecBG1oJ. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.
