So… in conclusion… what's the "winning" uri format that I should implement? ;o) I've lost track of the popular choice now.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Craig Neuwirt
Sent: Friday, 2 June 2006 10:25 a.m.
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Castle-users] assembly includes
Urls are a little more restrictive than Uris, but I agree with you. It make make more sense to follow the original suggestion.
On 6/1/06, hammett < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The schema is part of the uniform resource location specification. I
think we should stick with it the best we can... The only reason I
created the CustomUri is that the Uri class has a different behavior
on .net 1.1 and 2.0 (and possibly on mono).
On 6/1/06, Craig Neuwirt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hmm, Can we alter the CustomUri parsing to accomodate it without the ://?
> Otherwise the url looks a little funky. I'll take a closer look at the
> code.
--
Cheers,
hammett
http://www.castleproject.org/~hammett
_______________________________________________
CastleProject-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/castleproject-users
_______________________________________________
CastleProject-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/castleproject-users
_______________________________________________ CastleProject-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/castleproject-users
