There's a remoting facility that allow you to expose and consume remoting components. But if you want my opinion you shouldn't use microkernel/windsor unless you're comfortable with the concepts and with the problems it tries to solve. Otherwise it will just add pain, and make errors/bugs more difficult to track.
If you were working on a new but very basic app then you could try and experiment with an ioc container, but giving it a first try with a non trivial one will certainly make you lose time, hair and curse us a lot. On 8/28/06, Carlos Ble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Iam developing a new enterprise software for litle companies. Is a > software to manage invoices, storewarehouses and so on. > The architecture is client-server and the client is Gtk# (and > a MonoRail web based client for next releases). > What I pretend is to use ActiveRecord as the ORM, managed > by the server (with a facade maybe containing a third level cache and > other features) which will send and receive models from the client thru > Remoting. I thought in web services but XML Schema is a nightmare to > work with complex models and relations (circular reference problems) so > I think that Remoting is a better choice to do extreme programming. > What I am wondering now is how WindsorContainer and DynamicProxy fits > into the architecture. -- Cheers, hammett http://hammett.castleproject.org/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ CastleProject-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/castleproject-users
