Hmmm, extending the
bind-xml attribute to understand someting like
isn't a bad idea,
actually.
I wouldn't consider
it uncommon that the object structure differs from the XML
structure
and writing a
special FieldHandler for this wouldn't be necessary then.
I'm sorry I don't
have the resources to implement this...
Heiko Erhardt
skynamics
AG
www.skynamics.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 4:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [castor-dev] Unmarshalling when xml structure and java stucture are differentLooks like you need to implement a FieldHandler. Check the archives. You'll have to create a class used only for marshalling the "preferences" into and outof your Formulaire class. You'll also have to redo your mapping.xml.--m-----Original Message-----
From: dev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 4:38 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [castor-dev] Unmarshalling when xml structure and java stucture are different
Hi,
I am trying to unmarshall a xml that has a structure different from the java objects structure. Below are samples of what i mean.
Indeed, I'd like a mapping file like this (but of course it doesn't work)
<class name="Formulaire"><map-to xml="Formulaire"/>
....<field name="ComMedia" type="java.lang.String"> <bind-xml name="preference/comMedia" node="element"/> </field> <field name="ComLanguage" type="java.lang.String"> <bind-xml name="preference/comLanguage" node="element"/> </field>
....
</class>
This is the object I want:
public class Formulaire {
private String surname;
private String firstName;
private String address;
private String comMedia;
private String comLanguage;
public void setSurname(String surname){
this.surname=surname;
}
public String getSurname(){
return surname;
}
....
}
This is an extract of the XML I have to unmarshall:
<formulaire
<surname>MIS</surname>
<firstName>LILY</firstName>
<address>35 RUE DES BEAUX ARTS 75001 PARIS perso</address>
<preference><comMedia>PAPER</comMedia> <comLanguage>FR</comLanguage>
</preference>
</xsdFideS:applicationInfo>
In fact, I don't want to create new object for each subTree of the xml. I want to "flaten" the objet structure.
I don't want an object Preference with the field comMedia and comLanguage. I want this fields part of the Formulaire object.
Is it possible?
Thanks
Cedric ----------------------------------------------------------- If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of: unsubscribe castor-dev
