Hi John, The binding file will definitely be part of the next release; it is already in the CVS for some weeks. I've also put some documentation in the CVS that will appear in the Web Site with the next release.
Arnaud > -----Original Message----- > From: Weir, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 11:05 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [castor-dev] here is a feature submission - suffix > > Arnaud, > > Is the binding file going to be released with 0.9.4.2? Like dean I need > similar functionality and Rhetts solution seems just like the ticket. > > The only functionality that I want from Binding at the moment is the suffix > addition - are there any restrictions on using a binding file that I need to > be aware of? > > John > > -----Original Message----- > From: Dean Hiller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2002 12:56 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [castor-dev] here is a feature submission - suffix > > > thanks Rhett, Arnaud, I didn't know this functionality existed. Dean > > Rhett Sutphin wrote: > > > Hi Dean, > > > > This functionality is implied by the binding file schema, though I > > haven't tried it. To do what you want, it looks like you'd do > > something like this: > > > > <binding> > > ... > > <namingXML> > > <complexTypeName> > > <suffix>Abstract</suffix> > > </complexTypeName> > > </namingXML> > > ... > > </binding> > > > > HTH, > > Rhett Sutphin > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > >> Attached is my cvs diff -u . for a new very small feature. It is an > >> addition of a command line option I need. I have a 300 page xsd so > >> using a mapping file is something I really don't want to do. > >> Unfortunately, every element is a lower case version of it's complex > >> type causing many many name collisions. The command line option I > >> added is -suffix "suffix" which adds the appropriate suffix to all > >> classes representing complex types. This way there is no name > >> collision between elements and their complex types. Is this > >> acceptable? Can we commit this? It won't break anything. It is > >> just a small addition which would make my life super easy. Any other > >> ideas besides a mapping file are welcome, unless there is a way in > >> the mapping file to tell the sourceGenerator to generate all complex > >> types with the suffix Abstract. thanks, Dean > > > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------- If you > > wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of: > > unsubscribe castor-dev > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of: > unsubscribe castor-dev > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of: > unsubscribe castor-dev ----------------------------------------------------------- If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of: unsubscribe castor-dev
