Hi Keith! > I believe this issue was already fixed in the CVS when I fixed the > support for Documentation and AppInfo, which were both disabled in the > last couple of releases, but I'll double-check. I've just downloaded the "castor_daily_snapshot", build castor and regenerated my source. Unfortunately, the java code looks the same as it did before (generated with castor-0.9.4.2).
I've found a bug report (# 851) in bugzilla dealing with a similar topic: javadoc generation for an attribute. This bug has been solved by you. But this report says that the XML documentation shows up as a javadoc comment of the member variable. And the bug reporter wished castor would comment the getter and setter methods instead. In my code the documentation doesn't show up at all. Of course, it would be perfect if the documentation would show up with the public setter and getter :-) Thanks a lot for your help! Peter > --Keith > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I have a problem with generating javadoc comments from the > a XML schema > > using annotation/documentation tags. Isn't it possible to get schema > > documentation for a simple type into the generated java code? > > > > If this topic has already been discussed here, please > provide a hint to the > > topic. I couldn't find anything in the list archive. Thanks a lot! > > > > Detailed example: > > > > A simple schema with only 2 elements looks like this: > > > > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> > > <xsd:schema xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema";> > > <xsd:element name="Command" type="xsd:string"> > > <xsd:annotation> > > <xsd:documentation> > > Command description. > > </xsd:documentation> > > </xsd:annotation> > > </xsd:element> > > <xsd:element name="Command_Query"> > > <xsd:annotation> > > <xsd:documentation> > > Executes a command. > > </xsd:documentation> > > </xsd:annotation> > > <xsd:complexType> > > <xsd:sequence> > > <xsd:element ref="Command"/> > > </xsd:sequence> > > </xsd:complexType> > > </xsd:element> > > </xsd:schema> > > > > A class "Command_Query" is generated with correct comment. > But the "Command" > > documentation does not show up in the java code. The valid > parts look like: > > > > /** > > * Field _command > > */ > > private java.lang.String _command; > > > > /** > > * Method getCommandReturns the value of field 'command'. > > * > > * @return the value of field 'command'. > > */ > > public java.lang.String getCommand() > > { > > return this._command; > > } //-- java.lang.String getCommand() > > > > /** > > * Method setCommandSets the value of field 'command'. > > * > > * @param command the value of field 'command'. > > */ > > public void setCommand(java.lang.String command) > > { > > this._command = command; > > } //-- void setCommand(java.lang.String) > > > > It would be perfect if the ducomentation from the schema > would show up at > > the get and set methods... > > > > Thanks, Peter > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of: > > unsubscribe castor-dev > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of: > unsubscribe castor-dev > ----------------------------------------------------------- If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of: unsubscribe castor-dev
