|
����������� I
have a similar question then: ����������� Is
it possible to create a base class with for abstract Unmarshal
and Marshal methods (castor xml) such that I wouldn't have to explicitly
cast during class loading? ����������� I
would like my code to be able to accommodate unknown, future XML schemas that become
Castor-ized (as opposed to Pasteruized)
into Java objects like this: ����������� ����������� BaseClass bc� = (BaseClass) �Class.forName ( newCastorizedSchemaObject
); ����������� Without
having to explicitly know the type name that could happen in the future,
instead of ����������� BrandNewCastorObj� co = (BrandNewCastorObj) Class.forName
( "com.enron.shred.everything.BrandNewCastorObj"
) ����������� I
am new to Castor so I suppose this could be stupid question, but is it possible
to create generic Unmarshal code? -
steve -----O riginal Message----- Hi, (Sorry if this question has been posted before but
I've found it in the documentation neither the mailing list). + Is it possible to define a JDO's mapping for an
abstract class. I would expect to get back a collection of ImplClass1
and ImplClass2 's instances together. Thanks a lot, Isi, |
Title: JDO: Abstract class and inheritance
- [castor-dev] JDO: Abstract class and ... "Legido Mart�nez, Isidoro"
- Re: [castor-dev] JDO: Abstract c... Conor Allen
- Re: [castor-dev] JDO: Abstract c... Mielnicki, Steven J
- Re: [castor-dev] JDO: Abstract c... Conor Allen
- Re: [castor-dev] JDO: Abstract c... "Legido Mart�nez, Isidoro"
- Re: [castor-dev] JDO: Abstract c... Mielnicki, Steven J
- Re: [castor-dev] JDO: Abstract c... Conor Allen
