I feel that this is an essential behaviour and I was surprised that I couldn't find
any documentation or mails or anything about this topic.
As a newbie I wouldn't expect Castor to call my add-methods - it's a coincidence that
I observed it. If I had called the method for "include<something>" in stead of
"add<something>" Castor wouldn't use it right?
Thanx for valuable comments.
/Keld
----- Original Message -----
From: "Keith Visco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 10:48 PM
Subject: Re: [castor-dev] Question 4: usage of add/set-methods
>
> I'm not sure how it works in Castor JDO, but Castor XML will try to use
> adders before setters...
>
> --Keith
>
> Keld Helbig Hansen wrote:
> >
> > > but it seems like keld is saying that castor looks for the adders before
> > > the setters when both setMovies(...) and addMovie(...) methods are present.
> > >
> > > keld, is this correct?
> > >
> >
> > Yes, this is what I observed.
> >
> > /Keld
> >
> > -----------------------------------------------------------
> > If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of:
> > unsubscribe castor-dev
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of:
> unsubscribe castor-dev
>
>
-----------------------------------------------------------
If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of:
unsubscribe castor-dev
