It is possible to set cache-type to "none" in the mapping, though this may not solve all of your problems if you have a high degree of concurrency. If the 2 JDO objects are both trying to update rows in the database simultaneously, you may get errors associated with the detection of dirty reads/writes.
I hope this helps.
Patrick
HAMMELL,THOMAS (HP-NewJersey,ex2) wrote:
I'm trying to use multiple JDO objects to access the same database in different ways. I have a database that I'm using to represent directories and files in a file system. I have two tables a directory table and a file table. In some operations when I load a directory I want to load all the corresponding files that are children of the directory. For other operations when I load a directory I don't want to load the corresponding files. To do this I created two mapping files one that specifies the relation between the directories and files and one that doesn't. I then created two JDO objects one corresponding to each mapping file. The problem is that both JDO objects give the same results when I retrieve a directory. For example I first create the JDO object which corresponds to the mapping file that defines a relation between the directories and files then I create the JDO object that corresponds to the mapping file that doesn't have a relationship between directories and files. If I use the second JDO object to retrieve a directory I get its corresponding files for some reason even though the second JDO object doesn't know the relationship between directories and files. If I create the JDO objects in the opposite order then I get the opposite behavior. It almost seems that there is some kind of caches that is happening that is preventing the second JDO object from being created correctly. Is this a know problem and if so how do I get around it. If it is not a know problem then I would like to add it to the bug list. If I did not explain the problem properly and you need more explanation let me know. I have a complete example that shows the problem.
Thanks
Tom
----------------------------------------------------------- If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of:
unsubscribe castor-dev
