should be really easy to repro, just take a test case that has an OQL query with a 1:M and do an order by :)
-----Original Message----- From: Bruce Snyder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 1:00 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [castor-dev] Bug with complex ORDER BY queries (in Oracle?) This one time, at band camp, Alexey A. Efimov said: AAE>I think you must swap ORDER BY entries, becose REsultSet ordered in AAE>unknown format for Castor, but it very strange. I mean that: AAE>If first ordered by ORDER_ID AAE>ORDER_ID | BATCH_ID AAE>1 1 AAE>1 2 AAE>1 3 AAE>2 1 AAE>3 1 AAE>3 2 AAE>3 4 AAE> AAE>Castor look trough ResultSet and construct objects. It create 3 instance AAE>of Order, becose id follow in this nointerapteble order. AAE> AAE>So, if you order by BATCH_ID AAE>ORDER_ID | BATCH_ID AAE>1 1 AAE>2 1 AAE>3 1 AAE>1 2 AAE>3 2 AAE>1 3 AAE>3 4 AAE> AAE>Now Castor create 7 objects, but 3 will with id = 1, 1 with id = 2 and 3 AAE>with id = 3. AAE> AAE>BUG in this thing! AAE> AAE>Bruce take look at this, please!! This is actualy bug, i guess. I'm following the thread but I've been in meetings all day long for the past two days. I'll first need to develop a JUnit test to reproduce this so that I can then address the problem. I'll try to get started on this tonight, but any help I can get from you guys would be a huge help. Bruce -- perl -e 'print unpack("u30","<0G)[EMAIL PROTECTED]&5R\"F9E<G)E=\$\!F<FEI+F-O;0\`\`");' ----------------------------------------------------------- If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of: unsubscribe castor-dev ----------------------------------------------------------- If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of: unsubscribe castor-dev
