On Jun 27, 2005, at 10:33 AM, Ryan Tomayko wrote: > On Jun 27, 2005, at 9:55 AM, Fred Drake wrote: >> "application/egg+zip" would require registration. I've not seen the >> "+foo" annotation style used for anything other than "+xml" yet, but >> this use makes sense to me. > > Same here. I'm still trying to dig it up but I think I remember > seeing the "+foo" annotation explicitly specified in the normative > application/xml media type specification. But I'm not seeing it so > I could be wrong.
The "+xml" suffix is the only suffixing scheme at IANA and is normatively defined in the RFC 3023 XML Media Types [1]. The section linked to below contains justification for inventing the suffixing scheme, which is almost as interesting as it is amusing. :) [1] <http://rfc.net/rfc3023.html#p32> Ryan Tomayko [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://naeblis.cx/rtomayko/ _______________________________________________ Catalog-sig mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/catalog-sig
