On 7/6/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yep, they do, and someone here also suggested this approach. There is a > chance though that someone has distributed code that hasn't been exercised > yet. Slim, of course.
That code's only interesting if it gets executed. If it was distributed without even a test run, it's probably buggy anyway. ;-) Frequency of execution is harder to make predictions about, though. I figure if you look through a few months (like 3) of logs, that's plenty. Any calls that aren't found can be changed with impunity. Of course, one more round of emails on the topic means it'll be cheaper to leave the existing names regardless of how much better the new names are. -Fred -- Fred L. Drake, Jr. <fdrake at gmail.com> "Every sin is the result of a collaboration." --Lucius Annaeus Seneca _______________________________________________ Catalog-sig mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/catalog-sig
