> I tried using memcached for caching the database queries - for logged > in users. It did speed it up a little, but not that much. It turns > out that the templates take most of the time - at least on my machine.
For the majority of pages generated through page templates, I think the static generation would be fine. I'm looking primarily into the browse interface at the moment. > There's some timing in the webui that gets written to a file in /tmp/asdfsdaf > > For concurrent access then memcached will make more of a difference though. > > Memcache could help even for logged in people, but I think replacing > the template language with something faster will have the most effect. I'm quite skeptical on caching in general (even about the static page generation). It *should* be possible to make it fast enough so that it doesn't need caching. I consider caching a work-around, not a solution - and one with severe drawbacks. Regards, Martin _______________________________________________ Catalog-SIG mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/catalog-sig
