> No one. The usage agreement now gives the PSF the permission to perform > PyPI's function without needing to be concerned about the license terms > at all. That's the entire point of having the usage agreement. The > license of the code is irrelevant given that secondary agreement. If the > uploader does not have the rights to give that permission, then PyPI may > still have to take down the offending package, but I believe the > existence of the agreement helps them avoid damages (IANAL and am not > sure on this point). Without such an agreement, the PSF *would* have to > audit the packages and their licenses. The usage agreement is a more > efficient way to ensure that the PSF gets the necessary assurance that > it has the right to redistribute the uploaded packages.
Exactly so. Regards, Martin _______________________________________________ Catalog-SIG mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/catalog-sig
