Le mercredi 16 juin 2010 à 20:40 +0200, "Martin v. Löwis" a écrit : > Am 16.06.2010 13:44, schrieb Antoine Pitrou: > > Martin v. Löwis<martin<at> v.loewis.de> writes: > >> > >>> As a maintainer of the PyPI project, it makes your workflow simpler, > >>> > >>> - contributors can clone the repo, change the code and ask you for a pull > >>> - you can pull changes by direct hg commands, and merge them > >> > >> After using Mercurial in one project, I'm skeptical that this really > >> makes things simpler. I find it very hard to find out what changes a > >> specific clone has that I still need to integrate. Also, when merging > >> with conflicts, I find it very difficult to determine whether I merged > >> all the conflicts correctly (since the diff will show all changes, not > >> just the conflicts). > >> > >> So I rather expect things to become more difficult when switching to hg. > > > > I think it would be fair to bring those points on the mercurial > > mailing-list. > > After all we'll be one of their "high-profile" users, so they'd probably > > like us > > to enjoy the experience. > > I'm just a hg beginner, so it's probably all my fault, and I'm not using > it correctly.
There's no problem in asking beginner questions :) Regards Antoine. _______________________________________________ Catalog-SIG mailing list Catalog-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/catalog-sig
