Le 08/23/2010 05:56 AM, Tarek Ziadé a écrit : > If that's the case, then it should suffice to explain in the PEP that the >> intent of this field is for an author/owner to describe reorganization of >> their own software, rather than for one package to claim that it's a >> replacement for another. > We can improve the Obsoletes-Dist description, sure. Notice that > it will be misused if we don't add Conflict-Dist. That's basically > why I wanted to add this field, as suggested by someone on IRC (sorry > I forgot who) True: we need to make the descriptions clearer, especially fot the installation script creation POV.
I have updated the description of those two fields (that are obsoletes-Release and Conflict-Release — *not* dist), you can see the changes I propose here: http://bitbucket.org/ametaireau/python-peps/changeset/22f08df917f2 Cheers, Alexis _______________________________________________ Catalog-SIG mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/catalog-sig
