"Martin v. Löwis" wrote: >> You should also include: >> >> Framework :: Plone >> Framework :: Plone :: 3 >> Framework :: Plone :: 4 >> >> to make the set complete. > > I think I'll go by what the Plone community decides on. If they > don't need these classifiers, they just don't need them. The fewer > the better.
You probably missed Alex's reply: Alex Clark wrote: > OK I'm fine with this, then. So to reiterate, we are asking for (I forgot 3.2 > in the previous list): > > Framework :: Plone :: 3 > Framework :: Plone :: 3.2 > Framework :: Plone :: 3.3 > Framework :: Plone :: 4 > Framework :: Plone :: 4.0 > Framework :: Plone :: 4.1 > Framework :: Plone :: 4.2 > Framework :: Plone :: 4.3 -- Marc-Andre Lemburg eGenix.com Professional Python Services directly from the Source (#1, Nov 19 2011) >>> Python/Zope Consulting and Support ... http://www.egenix.com/ >>> mxODBC.Zope.Database.Adapter ... http://zope.egenix.com/ >>> mxODBC, mxDateTime, mxTextTools ... http://python.egenix.com/ ________________________________________________________________________ ::: Try our new mxODBC.Connect Python Database Interface for free ! :::: eGenix.com Software, Skills and Services GmbH Pastor-Loeh-Str.48 D-40764 Langenfeld, Germany. CEO Dipl.-Math. Marc-Andre Lemburg Registered at Amtsgericht Duesseldorf: HRB 46611 http://www.egenix.com/company/contact/ _______________________________________________ Catalog-SIG mailing list Catalog-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/catalog-sig
