That would be nice, you could include other stats information as well (not sure what yet).
Ken On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 4:48 PM, Tarek Ziadé <[email protected]> wrote: > On 4/16/12 9:58 PM, ken cochrane wrote: >> >> Ouch, does that take a while to gather the number of files? >> Is there any open source code that already does this, that I can look at? >> I'm thinking packages might be find for now. > > the other option would be to change the mirroring protocol to have that > total in a static page, like the timestamp > > >> >> Thanks, >> Ken >> >> >> On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Donald Stufft<[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> On Monday, April 16, 2012 at 3:46 PM, ken cochrane wrote: >>> >>> Is it possible to get the number of packages on each mirror? If so, >>> can you let me know and I'll look into adding it. >>> >>> Not without parsing the simple api. If you just want to know the total >>> number of >>> names, you can parse the index page for number of links. If you want the >>> total number >>> of files then you'll need to descend into all 20kish pages as well and >>> pull >>> links out of there. >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 5:15 AM, Sebastien Douche<[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Nice! Thanks Ken. Missing only an information imho: the number of >>> packages on each mirror (to known if the mirror is really up to date). >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Catalog-SIG mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/catalog-sig >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Catalog-SIG mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/catalog-sig > > > _______________________________________________ > Catalog-SIG mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/catalog-sig _______________________________________________ Catalog-SIG mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/catalog-sig
