On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 9:28 PM, Zygmunt Krynicki <[email protected]> wrote: > I did not realize that a basic install of plone is composed of 100+ > packages. If all of those packages are maintained by a coherent group > (pardon my ignorance of plone here) then perhaps that use case could > be managed by allowing the user to accept trust to a larger pool of > packages.
Most of them are done by a couple of groups, which share some people. But there is at least 20-30 packages in there that aren't maintained by these groups. Plone is trying to be user friendly. If the Python community in general would decide to go down this path, then Plone would be forced to simply not use standard Python packaging at all. Fortunately, I don't think the risk is very high. As mentioned, this is just not a practical or feasible way to solve the problem. //Lennart _______________________________________________ Catalog-SIG mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/catalog-sig
