On Feb 6, 2013, at 7:29 PM, Jacob Kaplan-Moss <ja...@jacobian.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 6:22 PM, <mar...@v.loewis.de> wrote: >> There are certainly more options: >> - don't use cookies 1: use basic auth instead >> - don't use cookies 2: use TLS session IDs instead >> - don't use cookies 3: use X.509 certificates instead >> - move the login site to a new TLD (e.g. python-cms.org) >> >> I'm not saying that all these options are practical, I'm just pointing >> out that there are definitely more than the three you've mentioned. > > Alright, I stand corrected; these are technically possible. > > Again, because I have a financial stake here I don't feel I can argue > for any particular solution without an accusation of bias. Instead > I'll simply ask you to read about the goals of the redesign (start > from http://jessenoller.com/blog/2012/11/28/the-great-python-org-redesign, > where you can find the RFP and the bid which became the working spec > document) and think about which solutions to the packages.python.org > problem best match the goals of the python.org redesign. > >> "Move to a new TLD" is much better than "tell people to go elsewhere", >> though. > > pypidocs.org and pypifiles.org are both available (as are the .com > versions). If anyone's even slightly interested let me know and I'll > buy them and donate them to the PSF, just in case. > Both are good and could also act as mirror sub domains. Donald can go into the issues with hosting the mirrors on their current domains > Jacob > _______________________________________________ > Catalog-SIG mailing lists > Catalog-SIG@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/catalog-sig _______________________________________________ Catalog-SIG mailing list Catalog-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/catalog-sig
