Hi,
I believe that this issue belongs to this list, please let me know if I'm
wrong.
Suppose I have 2 packages:
jmb.foo
jmb.bar
distributed separately. Each has in jmb's __init__ a standard:
__import__('pkg_resources').declare_namespace(__name__)
or
from pkgutil import extend_path
__path__ = extend_path(__path__, __name__)
I just realized that imp.find_module() will return "fake" values
imp.find_module('jmb', None)
may return (a tuple with) the path from the first package or from the
second. Many framework will fail to discover commands in the inner module:
one is detailed here [1] another is Django way of getting application's
commands.
I find it misleading to return a value that is not thorohly correct.
Is there a workaround? Is the current behaviour considered correct for
reasons I don't yet understand?
thanks in advance
sandro
*:-)
[1]
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5741362/alternatives-to-imp-find-module?answertab=votes#tab-top
--
Sandro Dentella *:-)
http://www.reteisi.org Soluzioni libere per le scuole
http://sqlkit.argolinux.org SQLkit home page - PyGTK/python/sqlalchemy
_______________________________________________
Catalog-SIG mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/catalog-sig
