Il giorno 27/feb/2013, alle ore 19:23, Donald Stufft <donald.stu...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
> On Wednesday, February 27, 2013 at 12:44 PM, Donald Stufft wrote: >>> >>> Why not first have an a good infrastructure and capacity with >>> pypi.python.org so that people *want* to move their files there? >> PyPI has had very good uptime since the move to OSL. I don't have >> numbers handy but I believe I can get them. > I got the numbers! Since almost a year ago (This was setup at the last > US PyCon): > > Uptime: 99.99% > Downtime: 6h 58m > Number of Downtimes: 126 > > I want to stress again that even if that was a poor number that adding > more points of failure only decrease the expected uptime, or at best > does nothing. In fact, adding a caching CDN in front of PyPI (instead of the current mirror protocol) would probably bring the uptime close to 100% for people downloading packages via pip. I'm +1 on dropping the current (complicated) mirror system and external links, and in favor of centralizing everything into PyPI, plus a third-party CDN / hosting service. In fact, Python is a big-enough brand name that we could even get a CDN service almost for free in exchange of an acknowledge of the CDN company being used. -- Giovanni Bajo :: ra...@develer.com Develer S.r.l. :: http://www.develer.com My Blog: http://giovanni.bajo.it
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Catalog-SIG mailing list Catalog-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/catalog-sig
