On Thursday, February 28, 2013 at 7:56 AM, Reinout van Rees wrote:
> On 28-02-13 10:43, holger krekel wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 06:38 +0100, Andreas Jung wrote:
> > >
> > > I give a shit at the arguments pulled out every time by package
> > > maintainers using PyPI only for listing their packages. I am both
> > > annoyed and bothered by these people.
> > >
> >
> >
> > I didn't see such positions from package maintainers here. In fact
> > i haven't seen anyone stepping up saying listing packages externally
> > is a great idea. Could you point to those posts?
> >
>
>
> The position Andreas probably means is projects that *do* advertise
> themselves on pypi, but don't put their files there.
>
> I have seen that position in this discussion ("I have to upload 120
> files per release, so I won't do that", for instance).
>
> Some arguments might be valid, but these projects *are*, taken as one
> group, actively breaking pip and buildout regularly.
>
> So I agree with Andreas. I don't really care about "the arguments pulled
> out every time". Effectively actively breaking pip and buildout is bad,
> period.
>
>
> Reinout
>
> --
> Reinout van Rees http://reinout.vanrees.org/
> [email protected] http://www.nelen-schuurmans.nl/
> "If you're not sure what to do, make something. -- Paul Graham"
>
> _______________________________________________
> Catalog-SIG mailing list
> [email protected] (mailto:[email protected])
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/catalog-sig
>
>
https://crate.io/externally-hosted/ A list of things that have no files hosted
on
PyPI but have a release. This doesn't include things that uploads sometimes
but not everytime (argparse for example the latest releases have not been
uploaded to PyPI).
_______________________________________________
Catalog-SIG mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/catalog-sig
