On Thursday, February 28, 2013 at 7:56 AM, Reinout van Rees wrote: > On 28-02-13 10:43, holger krekel wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 06:38 +0100, Andreas Jung wrote: > > > > > > I give a shit at the arguments pulled out every time by package > > > maintainers using PyPI only for listing their packages. I am both > > > annoyed and bothered by these people. > > > > > > > > > I didn't see such positions from package maintainers here. In fact > > i haven't seen anyone stepping up saying listing packages externally > > is a great idea. Could you point to those posts? > > > > > The position Andreas probably means is projects that *do* advertise > themselves on pypi, but don't put their files there. > > I have seen that position in this discussion ("I have to upload 120 > files per release, so I won't do that", for instance). > > Some arguments might be valid, but these projects *are*, taken as one > group, actively breaking pip and buildout regularly. > > So I agree with Andreas. I don't really care about "the arguments pulled > out every time". Effectively actively breaking pip and buildout is bad, > period. > > > Reinout > > -- > Reinout van Rees http://reinout.vanrees.org/ > rein...@vanrees.org http://www.nelen-schuurmans.nl/ > "If you're not sure what to do, make something. -- Paul Graham" > > _______________________________________________ > Catalog-SIG mailing list > Catalog-SIG@python.org (mailto:Catalog-SIG@python.org) > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/catalog-sig > >
https://crate.io/externally-hosted/ A list of things that have no files hosted on PyPI but have a release. This doesn't include things that uploads sometimes but not everytime (argparse for example the latest releases have not been uploaded to PyPI).
_______________________________________________ Catalog-SIG mailing list Catalog-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/catalog-sig