On 2013-03-28 21:57:11 +0000, Donald Stufft said:


On Mar 28, 2013, at 5:42 PM, Tres Seaver <tsea...@palladion.com> wrote:

Signed PGP part
On 03/28/2013 04:32 PM, PJ Eby wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Donald Stufft <don...@stufft.io>
wrote:
On Mar 28, 2013, at 3:39 PM, PJ Eby <p...@telecommunity.com> wrote:
Can we do it by just dropping catalog-sig and keeping
distutils-sig? I'm afraid we might lose some important
distutils-sig population if the process involves renaming the
list, resubscribing, etc.  I also *really* don't want to
invalidate archive links to the distutils-sig archive.

All in all, +1 on not having two lists, but I'm really worried
about "breaking" distutils-sig.  We're still going to be talking
about "distribution utilities", after all.

Worst case I'm sure subscribers can be transferred and the existing
archive kept intact.

That's a great way to have a bunch of people complaining that they
never subscribed to packaging-sig, not to mention the part where it
breaks everyone's mail filters.

I really don't see any gains for renaming the list.  It's not like we
can go and scrub the entire internet of references to distutils-sig.

Not to mention breaking the gmane.org gateway, and those of us who sip
the firehose there instead of trying to swallow it via e-mail.


Tres.
- --
==================================================================> Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tsea...@palladion.com
Palladion Software   "Excellence by Design"    http://palladion.com


_______________________________________________
Distutils-SIG maillist  -  distutils-...@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig

This problem is inherent no matter what name is picked. GMane will need updated and some messages will need sent to tell people about the new name. No matter what at least one name isn't going to be used anymore.

It's not that big of a deal.


FWIW: I am a GMANE-sipper and I'm willing to rejoin a new packaging-sig list (as well as register the new list with GMANE if no one else does). Seems to me another viable option is to simply turn off catalog-sig and distutils-sig (while preserving the archives forever, of course) and just start chatting on packaging-sig. Send an email to both lists "Last post, please join packaging-sig" and you are done.



-----------------
Donald Stufft
PGP: 0x6E3CBCE93372DCFA // 7C6B 7C5D 5E2B 6356 A926 F04F 6E3C BCE9 3372 DCFA



<image>_______________________________________________
Catalog-SIG mailing list
Catalog-SIG@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/catalog-sig


--
Alex Clark ยท http://about.me/alex.clark


_______________________________________________
Catalog-SIG mailing list
Catalog-SIG@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/catalog-sig

Reply via email to