On 7/3/06, Matt S Trout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > RFC a proposed API to the DBIC list if you want to see that in 0.08 - or at > the very least throw together a couple of tests for the hack if you want to be > able to rely on it in production :)
I was thinking about that earlier today. There should be a friendlier way of doing that. It should be a very simple API though. Maybe it could even be added in 0.07001 (as it happened before to some other features in 0.06xxx I think), since it would just be adding something that didn't exist before will probably just be a method or something like that. Or maybe it should be a deeper change such as "me" being current resultset scoped instead of whatever it is right now. But probably this already too much off-topic for this list. I'll try to post a proper RFC later this week to the DBIC list after I figure out a good solution. > Hey, not complaining - but it *was* a dev release from the -current and it > won't go to trunk and thence CPAN until we've fixed it. Yes, yes. But I thought that a release was emminent and then "OMG the app doesn't work" panic bells started ringing all over my head. And I'm *really* glad you'll be fixing it, even though it's not a supported API (honestly, I didn't really know it was an unsupported hack when you told me to use it - I assumed I had just overlooked the docs or something like that). -Nilson Santos F. Jr. _______________________________________________ List: Catalyst@lists.rawmode.org Listinfo: http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.rawmode.org/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/