Ted Carnahan wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-10-20 at 13:06 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> I recall the new answer being along the lines of upgrade Tie::RefHash
>> due to some threading issues. I did not go for it because I also ran
>> i
>> into issues when upgrading Cwd, because it was in site when it
>> should
>> have been in lib, or vice versa, and CPAN couldn't delete the old
>> one,
>> or was still seeing the old one even though the new one was
>> installed.
>
> Ah ha! That's what we needed to do. Everything works very well with
> Tie::RefHash 1.34. Perhaps this should be added to the docs?
Start a new thread summarising it, this one's gone on so long I've completely
lost track of the original problem and I suspect the doc team have as well.
--
Matt S Trout Offering custom development, consultancy and support
Technical Director contracts for Catalyst, DBIx::Class and BAST. Contact
Shadowcat Systems Ltd. mst (at) shadowcatsystems.co.uk for more information
+ Help us build a better perl ORM: http://dbix-class.shadowcatsystems.co.uk/ +
_______________________________________________
List: [email protected]
Listinfo: http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
