Joe Landman wrote: >> [Alan Humphrey] ------- >> c'mon now. Be fair in your comparisons. Wouldn't the Mason/Cat/DBIC >> example look something like: >> >> <table> >> % while (my $row = $rows->next()) { >> <tr> >> <td><% $row->name %></td><td><% $row->whatever %></td> >> </tr> >> % } >> </table> > > yes, this is more apples to apples, and it looks and feels quite a bit > more Perl-ish to me than TT.
Hmm. You've convinced me to take a look at Mason for my views. I've done the most of my development in Interchange, whose mini-lang I've become quite comfortable with. Runners up being php and CGI.pm. When I started playing with Catalyst, I started with TT in the tutorial and have gone with it since then. I think I might like Mason better. JT _______________________________________________ List: Catalyst@lists.rawmode.org Listinfo: http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.rawmode.org/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/