On Sun, 29 Oct 2006, Hermida, Leandro wrote: > I seem to be leaning on the side of Mason so far ...
If considering Mason as a templating language for Catalyst, it's worth looking at Text::MicroMason (and Catalyst::View::MicroMason). _Almost_ the same syntax as HTML::Mason but fewer prerequisites (in particular not requiring mod_perl) which makes installs for developers a bit easier. The main downside is Text::MicroMason's current habit of only reporting syntax errors with line numbers from the generated Perl version of the template. If you do use Catalyst::View::MicroMason you probably want the current developer version (0.04_01) which fixes problems working with config files. Jon. -- Jon Warbrick Web/News Development, Computing Service, University of Cambridge _______________________________________________ List: Catalyst@lists.rawmode.org Listinfo: http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.rawmode.org/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
