On 11/16/06, Matt S Trout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Besides which, I've never yet seen a production application (and between Shadowcat's client portfolio I've seen not a small number thereof) where the dispatch overhead was even statistically significant to the overall performance - the bottleneck has always been either data retrieval or template rendering.
This makes me wonder if these high traffic Catalyst sites are using TT or another templating solution. If they are using TT, it should be very helpful if someone published a sort of TT performance guide. Or at least a bulleted list with things not to do because I'm probably doing them all, given the current (lack of) speed from my applications without that much traffic. Any complex (or just plain big) page will take around 3-4 seconds to render with 90% of that time being spent with TT. The best work around was to use one of the caching plugins where I could, but users still have to experience crappy load times whenever something is updated on the database. Thankfully, it's an internal system - so it's not *that* critical. -Nilson Santos F. Jr. _______________________________________________ List: Catalyst@lists.rawmode.org Listinfo: http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.rawmode.org/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
