Nilson Santos Figueiredo Junior wrote: > On 12/4/06, Octavian Rasnita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Yes of course, but if thinking this way, PHP could be considered not very >> successfully, because it is not an extraordinary language, however, it is >> used in much more web sites than perl, and some big sites like Yahoo also >> use it. > > PHP is very popular and thus successful, from a marketing POV. > However, technically, it's a recipe for spaghetti code. > >> So I think a successful framework should be good and flexible, but also >> accessible, easy to learn, and *portable to Windows*, because most of the >> computer users are using Windows, Apache is the most used web server, but >> the percent of the sites that use Apache decreases and the percent of IIS >> sites increases. > > I agree with you up to the point where you cite IIS as a viable > alternative to Apache. > It's not, period.
Actually, that's close to being not true now that Vista is out. IIS7 is a huge rewrite, stealing its modularized-ness from Apache. The new IIS7 stuff can run FastCGI, and as such, it's PHP, and potentially else FastCGI-based is screaming fast compared to before. http://blogs.iis.net/bills/archive/2006/10/31/IIS-Team-Announces-FastCGI-For-IIS-5.1_2C00_-IIS-6.0-and-IIS7.aspx But I digress... Yes, kill the thread. :-) -=Chris
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ List: Catalyst@lists.rawmode.org Listinfo: http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.rawmode.org/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/