Matthieu Codron wrote: > On 1/2/07, Joe Landman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Might be a good thing to have an MODULES_CURRENT/MODULES_OBSOLETE list, >> or ask the module authors to simply note the obsolescence in an updated >> POD. > > I think it is a terrific idea. > Catalyst is a lot about choice and flexibility, but reading the list makes > me really think that there are good choices, bad choices, and even good > ones that become bad.
I remember an effort for making a DeprecatedPlugins Plugin, but I don't know where that stands. A plugin emmitting warnings based on a list in the module (deprecated modules and replacements, specific versions, etc) sounds easier to manage and keep up-to-date than a wiki page. -- # Robert 'phaylon' Sedlacek # Perl 5/Catalyst Developer in Hamburg, Germany { EMail => ' [EMAIL PROTECTED] ', Web => ' http://474.at ' } _______________________________________________ List: Catalyst@lists.rawmode.org Listinfo: http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.rawmode.org/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/