Apache still needs to fork mod_perl.

This is a non-issue for an external FCGI server.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Octavian Rasnita [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 2:38 PM
> To: The elegant MVC web framework
> Subject: Re: [Catalyst] serving static files
> 
> 
> From: "Perrin Harkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> > If you're serving static files and running mod_perl without 
> a reverse
> > proxy, that should be the first thing you change.  It has a very
> > significant effect on performance.
> >
> > - Perrin
> 
> Sorry for off topicness, but please tell me, does it have a 
> bad effect if
> the files are just some files sitting in a directory, and 
> they are served by
> apache directly, with no relations with the directories that 
> are handled by
> a perl-script handler?
> 
> What I don't understand is why serving the files directly 
> decreases the
> performance of mod_perl apps, even though downloading those 
> files has no
> relation with those mod_perl apps.
> 
> Does it happen the same in case of FastCGI applications?
> 
> Do you have a recommendation for a text for learning how to 
> use a reverse 
> proxy?
> 
> Thank you.
> 
> Octavian
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> List: Catalyst@lists.rawmode.org
> Listinfo: http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
> Searchable archive: 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.rawmode.org/
> Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
> 

_______________________________________________
List: Catalyst@lists.rawmode.org
Listinfo: http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.rawmode.org/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/

Reply via email to