On 30 Jan 2007, at 09:07, Tobias Kremer wrote:
I was just looking at this last week, as I was using the code as a
basis for a new controller. I suspect that it's never been tested,
because as far as I can tell, it incorrectly reads the config from
the
controller object, rather than the application object.
Yeah, I stumbled across this the other day but was unsure if it was
done on purpose (for a controller-specific configuration rather than a
global config). Nevertheless I found it awkward and IMHO it should
be changed.
Why can't you just use a common base class for any controllers that
need the same defaults?
--
Matt S Trout, Technical Director, Shadowcat Systems Ltd.
Offering custom development, consultancy and support contracts for
Catalyst,
DBIx::Class and BAST. Contact mst (at) shadowcatsystems.co.uk for
details.
+ Help us build a better perl ORM: http://dbix-
class.shadowcatsystems.co.uk/ +
_______________________________________________
List: Catalyst@lists.rawmode.org
Listinfo: http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.rawmode.org/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
