I thought of using fcgi also, but wondered if the fact that lighty doesn't make the fcgi connection persistent was significant.
On 3/15/07, Michele Beltrame <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello! I'm about to deploy an application, and this time I can choose to use Lightpd instead of Apache+fcgid, which I commonly use. I have no problem with the latter configuration, but I was wondering if someone has comments/experience about Lighttpd for running Catalyst applications, i.e. speed, memory footprint, etc... I'm on a VPS environment, so speed can be an import factor for choice. Thanks, Michele. _______________________________________________ List: Catalyst@lists.rawmode.org Listinfo: http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.rawmode.org/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
-- Daniel McBrearty email : danielmcbrearty at gmail.com www.engoi.com : the multi - language vocab trainer BTW : 0873928131 _______________________________________________ List: Catalyst@lists.rawmode.org Listinfo: http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.rawmode.org/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
