Matt S Trout wrote:
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 03:55:16AM -0700, Jonathan Swartz wrote:
mia wrote:
Matt S Trout wrote:
On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 02:18:33PM -0700, mla wrote:
Assuming I'm not using threads, how would I hurt myself by
subclassing Catalyst and supplying a MyApp->context that returns
the current catalyst context?
Yes, I'd like to know more about this too please. Mason has a similar
construct - HTML::Mason::Request->instance() - and it works fine with
Mason subrequests or recursive calls to an entirely different Mason
interpreter. It just returns the value of a dynamically scoped
variable that is set at the beginning of a Mason request.
If you like that style, load Catalyst::Plugin::Singleton and enjoy. I don't
but I'm not the arbiter of bad code :)
Cool, that's exactly what I was hoping for.
Other than the fact you don't like the style, why is it bad?
You don't like singletons?
_______________________________________________
List: Catalyst@lists.rawmode.org
Listinfo: http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.rawmode.org/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
