* Jonathan T. Rockway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-28 02:35]: > On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 11:57:01AM -0700, Mesdaq, Ali wrote: > > Are you sure that InnoDB would solve this issue? Even if just > > a row was locked and you have 2 inserts at the exact same > > time how would that resolve the issue? > > One transaction would succeed and the other would fail. If you > want different behavior, you'll have to change the isolation > level (or actualy, in this case, rethink your app). > > It's more of an issue of this: > > User visits page A. > User visits page B in another tab. > User submits form A. > User submits form B. > A updates the flash. > B updates the flash. > Page A2 loads with whatever flash won. > Page B2 loads with whatever flash won.
Keeping implicit state on the server blows. News at 11. (The right way: don’t use flash. Put the stuff somewhere where you can give it a URI and send the user to that address.) Regards, -- Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/> _______________________________________________ List: Catalyst@lists.rawmode.org Listinfo: http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.rawmode.org/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
