On Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 06:19:09PM -0400, Perrin Harkins wrote: > On 7/30/07, Matt S Trout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I used to consider it a neat hack. After some time with the internals, > > some fun explicitly disabling it within DBIC since it sometimes broke > > our reconnect code, and even then discovering I could often solve > > client mod_perl problems by removing the line that loaded it from > > httpd.conf, I reclassified it was 'awful'. > > Your implication is that Apache::DBI doesn't work, as opposed to > simply clashing with some of the DBIC code that tries to manage the > same connections. It works just fine. It's widely-used and does what > it was intended to without known bugs.
I think mst's point was "if you don't know why to use Apache::DBI, don't use it". Generally good advice. Regards, Jonathan Rockway _______________________________________________ List: Catalyst@lists.rawmode.org Listinfo: http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.rawmode.org/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
