On Thursday 16 August 2007 13:42, Tobias Kremer wrote: > Quoting Bernhard Graf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > I use daemontools similar to > > http://www.catalystframework.org/calendar/2006/4 . > > Thanks! I'll take a look at it. You should definitely do that. Not only for this case - daemontools (or similar like runit) are superior for nearly every server service on *ix OSes. Check out http://smarden.org/runit/runscripts.html and compare the scripts with typical System-V run scripts (not mentioning the supervision concept in general). > For now I'm gonna try running two independent FastCGI process > managers and restart them on different hours via a cronjob so that > one of them will always be available to lighttpd. Other solutions are > still welcome! :) Why two FCGI process managers? To compensate FCGI downtimes? Did you find a way to tell lighttpd not to talk to an FCGI process that is down? I only get a 500 error in that case. -- Bernhard Graf _______________________________________________ List: Catalyst@lists.rawmode.org Listinfo: http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.rawmode.org/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
