Excellent, and thank you for your work. As mentioned already I've used Log4perl on another project and I never ran into the issue. I googled for "catalyst log4perl duplicate" and the FAQ didn't turn up on the first page. Had I removed catalyst from the search terms, it would have been item number two.
My apologies. Regards, Marius K. Adam Jacob wrote: > On 1/7/08, Marius Kjeldahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I tried briefly looking into the source, when I ran into this: >> >> # I really have no idea why the correct subroutine >> # is on a different call stack >> $caller{subroutine} = ( caller(1) )[3]; #wtf? >> >> Does anybody want to comment on the maturity of the Catalyst log4perl >> module? > > Besides the smarty-pants comment, it's pretty mature. :) > > Adam > _______________________________________________ List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/