Bill Moseley wrote:

Argh.  My apologies to Gerda.  Gerda wanted to convert Form::Processor
to Moose and had put a lot of work into it.  I couldn't get the
versions Gerda sent to me to pass the tests on the my applications
that user Form::Processor. Unfortunately, work took a higher priority
than changing method makers from Rose::Object to Moose.
It's tough to maintain compatibility with major changes in architecture. And finding time is always a challenge...
I missed any discussion of a new module, and its name. I purposely
didn't use "HTML" in the module name because Form::Processor isn't
just about building HTML forms.  The existing form modules at the time
were focused (in part) on HTML generation (which I never need), but
what I needed was a way to move data in and out of the model layer via
"forms".  Indeed, my application's API use Form::Processor as well as
command line scripts -- and there's no HTML in those actions.

FormHandler works the same in this respect--but I do think that processing HTML forms is the central use case, so I don't think an HTML in the name will lose many users...

Thanks again for the good work on Form::Processor.

Gerda






_______________________________________________
List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk
Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/

Reply via email to