On Mon, 25 May 2009, J. Shirley wrote:
Rather than Catalyst being geared towards TT, I would say Mason is geared towards being a framework :)
Well, sort of. Mason is quite usable as a "pure" templating system. I use Mason with Catalyst for all my new projects, and the framework parts of Mason really don't matter to me.
The view should just be thin templates, in that regard I would recommend using Catalyst::View::MicroMason ( http://search.cpan.org/~jrockway/Catalyst-View-MicroMason-0.05/lib/Catalyst/View/MicroMason.pm) which wraps Text::MicroMason (Mason template syntax without the "framework").
Except you also lose really useful non-framework features like autohandlers, which are like TT's WRAPPER (but better, IMO).
-dave /*============================================================ http://VegGuide.org http://blog.urth.org Your guide to all that's veg House Absolute(ly Pointless) ============================================================*/ _______________________________________________ List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
