On Saturday 07 November 2009 01:08:33 pm Steve Rippl wrote: > it's just that I had started thinking > in terms of "nested" flow control because that's what I wanted (wishful > thinking...). I thought perhaps each forward created a separate > nest/level I could detach out of and previous forwards were > "remembered", but obviously this isn't the case.
No, this *is* the case, 100%. Forward is nothing more than a function call, so you can nest it and you get a call stack. It's just that, as I pointed out, detach throws an extension that unwinds that whole stack. Andrew _______________________________________________ List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
